🚨 DRAMA AT OLD TRAFFORD! 🚨 “That’s unbelievably soft! He’s fallen far too easily!” – Rio Ferdinand expresses his frustration as Matthijs de Ligt’s goal for Manchester United is ruled out during their Europa League showdown against Rangers. Supporters are furious with both the referee and VAR over this controversial call! WHAT’S EVEN MORE STUNNING? THE PREMIER LEAGUE’S EXPLANATION FOR DISALLOWING THE GOAL! 😱😱😱

In a heated Europa League clash at Old Trafford, Manchester United’s Matthijs de Ligt thought he had put his team ahead, only for his goal to be controversially ruled out. The decision, based on an alleged foul in the build-up, has sparked a wave of disagreement among both fans and analysts, who continue to debate its validity.

The moment unfolded when de Ligt leapt to connect with a corner, expertly steering the ball past Rangers’ goalkeeper. However, after a review by VAR, the referee determined that a United player had committed a foul before the goal was scored. Many spectators were left puzzled by the ruling, as video replays showed only slight contact, leaving room for interpretation.

Former Manchester United defender Rio Ferdinand did not hold back in his criticism of the decision. He described the call as excessively harsh, arguing that the opposing player exaggerated the contact. “That’s so soft, he’s gone down like a pack of cards!” Ferdinand remarked, making it clear that he felt the ruling was unjust. He also voiced concerns that such decisions weaken the physical aspect of football.

Supporters took to social media to express their anger, with many claiming that the ruling set a dangerous precedent for aerial duels. One fan sarcastically suggested that all aerial challenges should be banned if such minimal contact was considered a foul. Another voiced frustration at the role of VAR, arguing that instead of resolving disputes, it was creating even more controversy.

The Premier League later issued a statement in support of the decision, emphasizing that the goal had been overturned due to a “clear and obvious foul” as identified by VAR. However, this explanation did little to ease the frustration of Manchester United fans, who remained unconvinced that the contact warranted disallowing the goal.

This latest controversy only adds fuel to the ongoing debate about VAR’s effectiveness. Throughout the season, numerous contentious calls have sparked criticism of the system’s consistency and reliability. Many are now calling for a reassessment of how VAR is used to ensure more fairness in officiating.

With emotions running high, the discussion over VAR’s impact on the game is unlikely to subside anytime soon. Critics argue that while the technology was introduced to eliminate errors, it has instead introduced a new layer of uncertainty. Supporters of the system, however, maintain that it provides an extra level of scrutiny necessary for high-stakes matches.

Regardless of where one stands on the issue, de Ligt’s disallowed goal has become a focal point in the wider debate about refereeing standards and the role of VAR. As controversies continue to arise, football’s governing bodies may soon face increased pressure to implement reforms that restore confidence in officiating decisions.